Tuesday, 24 July 2007

Jane CHRISTMAS Lefroy!!!

Okay, I need to breathe now. My dearest librarian Linda (million of thanks, Linda!) has confirmed from her copy of ‘Visitation of Ireland’ that Thomas Langlois Lefroy’s eldest daughter was indeed named ‘Jane’. Her complete name?

Jane Christmas Lefroy. Born June 24, 1802 and died August 3, 1896. Never married.

Christmas.

Tom Lefroy first met Jane Austen during the 1795 Christmas holiday in Hampshire. Daughter Jane was NOT born in December (nor conceived in December for that matter, that would be in October…), hence the ‘Christmas’ MUST BE referring to Jane Austen!

Oh, I cannot breathe… help… Tom Lefroy indeed named his first daughter after Jane Austen…

Jane Lefroy's date of birth will also confirm that the movie Becoming Jane was more or less correct with Jane Lefroy's age. In the movie, she was portrayed as a teenager, circa 15 years old. If the movie Tom Lefroy met Jane Austen again circa 1816, thus Tom's daughter Jane would be around 13-14 years old then.

A bit off topic: on the other side of Atlantic, my dearest Rachel is trying to find out something about Bray. Will not get the result for a few months, perhaps, for she needs to visit the town on her own… but fingers crossed… we don’t know what she will find…

Closing the post, herewith I give you a piece of Paul Simon's song 'Father and Daughter' which I think portrays Tom Lefroy and his Jane Christmas so much:

I'm gonna watch you shine
Gonna watch you grow
Gonna paint a sign
So you'll always know
As long as one and one is two
There could never be a father
Who loved his daughter more than I love you

Reference:

Howard, J. J. & Crisp, F. A. 1973, Visitation of Ireland, Genealogical Publishing Com.

Pic 1: Snow Child, by Hilda Boswell (flipped horizontally)

Pic 2: Steventon at Christmas, by Jane Odiwe


PS 15 June 2008:

Please see this post on Mary Paul's genealogy to find the traditional reason behind Jane Christmas' name.

5 comments:

Arnie Perlstein said...

Icha,

Without some other bit of corroborative evidence, I think you are still in the realm of speculation, but I admire your ingenuity and willingness to take a risk to see if an idea will fly. If your hunch is correct, this is the only way it will have a chance to be tested. My experience has often been that I find something that by itself is merely speculative, but over time, as I connect more and more dots, suddenly that seemingly isolated finding is seen to connect to something else, and TOGETHER, you have something like solid evidence.

So, I say, keep firing away, even if only 25% of your speculations hold water, that is still 25% more than would have been found if everyone continued to play it safe.

Bravo! ;)

Icha said...

LOL! I'm not surprised, Arnie, that you remain skeptic. That's very you...

In response to more evidence, I've kidnapped Linda to help me marshaling more evidence on that. E.g., we want to find out Mary Paul's and Jane Paul's dates of birth. If they were not born in December, then it rules out that the Jane name refers to Jane Paul.

Or, I am tempted to say, it is possible that Tom 'used' the fact that Mrs. Paul's name was Jane as a 'decoy', and inserted the Christmas reference for a child born in June, and conceived in October... I don't say that he cheated... he simply wanted to give nods to the Hampshire Jane.

Sarah said...

I immediately connected those dots as well (Jane Christmas with Tom meeting Jane in December), and agree that it is wonderful speculation.

However, was it common for men to have such a hand in their children's namings? Could there be another reason she had the middle name of Christmas? It would be lovely if something had indeed happened between Jane and Tom at Christmastime.

Imagine how often this sort of love was thwarted...

Also, I highly recommend reading Linda Robinson Walker's thesis on Jane and Tom, if anyone hasn't yet. It's the most complete and concise explanation of their relationship. http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol27no1/walker.htm#1

Icha said...

Dear Sarah, sorry for not being clear with this post. We've found out and concluded that TLL named his first daughter Jane Christmas as a homage to Mary Paul's mother (Jane) and ancestor (Christmas)

http://becomingjane.blogspot.com/search/label/Jane%20Christmas%20Lefroy

http://becomingjane.blogspot.com/2007/09/mary-pauls-genealogy.html

However, we do agree that the coincidence is amazing.

And yes, I've read Walker's thesis. It's a very good read for Jane and Tom.

Anonymous said...

I know this thread is a few years old, but I find it interesting that Jane Austen was born in December. I had always thought that was the reason he gave his daughter the middle name Christmas. Enjoying your website.