tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1129024732653900038.post2433740006711573382..comments2023-11-04T21:26:59.215+08:00Comments on Becoming Jane Fansite: Jane Austen portraitIchahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11201156394951497511noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1129024732653900038.post-64178043091830650862017-11-17T14:10:59.421+08:002017-11-17T14:10:59.421+08:00I am terribly sorry for our total slack of checkin...I am terribly sorry for our total slack of checking the old comments. We haven't been checking it for a while, thus we missed your comment. I will make more time to check comments from our dear readers. Please do forgive us for this oversight, and thank you for visiting us...Ichahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11201156394951497511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1129024732653900038.post-41460459634509612802017-09-22T01:17:10.460+08:002017-09-22T01:17:10.460+08:00It would be truly wonderfull, if this lovely girl ...It would be truly wonderfull, if this lovely girl was Jane austen. But i don`t think she is wearing the right fashion for 1788, therefore i do not believe she can be Jane.....<br /><br />Cathy van Weverwijknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1129024732653900038.post-24717022671466621352015-03-16T08:56:48.693+08:002015-03-16T08:56:48.693+08:00The little girl was certainly much more alive than...The little girl was certainly much more alive than what transpired through Cassandra's "classical" JA painting (which I dislike so much). And we did have several posts about the facial contour analysis etc about the painting in the blog years ago... I believe this little girl was Jane Austen indeed.<br /><br />thanks for the post!Ichahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11201156394951497511noreply@blogger.com